A result-first walkthrough with numbered steps, highlighted prompts and clear before-and-after proof. Harper’s editing structure, interpreted for Will.
Adapted from Harper CarrollReference adaptation
In the reference The reference opens with thumbnail evidence, moves through numbered steps and returns to the resulting workflow. Wider presenter shots separate denser screen-led sections.
Suggested rhythm: a visual update around a new action or phrase, often 2–4 seconds. Dense prompts and results need longer holds. Fit the script, not a fixed duration.
In the reference Harper’s source is a warm domestic setting paired with light graphic cards. That location and palette belong to the source creator.
No source LUT is claimed. Start from a neutral camera correction; compare face, paper whites and studio lights across scenes.
In the reference The reference uses sentence-case sans subtitles and separate editorial graphic headings. Prompt highlights guide attention within a larger card.
At 1080 × 1920, start captions at 56–64 px and keep two lines maximum. A step badge is functional navigation, not a decorative label above every heading.
In the reference The source combines before/after thumbnail grids, numbered step cards, a prompt with moving highlights, screen recordings and a results dashboard.
Start with an evidence panel occupying about 55% of the vertical frame. Use a small yellow step chip, an ink border and an uncluttered cream ground. Abstract diagrams still use the current explainer skill.
In the reference Clear spoken dialogue drives the reference. The viewing analysis does not establish a specific music track or repeatable sound-effects recipe.
Suggested delivery target: around −16 LUFS integrated with true peak at or below −1 dBTP. Listen through on headphones and phone speakers.
Workflow tutorials · Before & after demos · Practical case studies
Copy the brief into your editing chat with your script and footage. The skill includes the complete recipe and reference notes.
Use the Will Francis Proof-led walkthrough style, adapted from the linked Harper Carroll reference. Read the attached recipe and current brand guide. Open with a real result, explain the workflow in numbered steps, highlight one useful prompt clause at a time and finish with visible proof. Use my footage, Sentient headings, Inter UI text, Avenir Next Bold captions, cream evidence panels and yellow emphasis. Keep natural skin tones and my studio colour. Use only real results and source recordings. The reference supplies editing structure, not its creator’s identity, music or claims. Plan source timecodes, caption breaks and missing evidence before rendering.
What comes from Harper’s edit, and what makes the adaptation Will’s.
| From the reference | In Will’s version |
|---|---|
| Result before explanation | Will’s specific, factual hook |
| Numbered process and prompt emphasis | Sentient, Inter and signature yellow |
| Presenter plus large proof panel | Will’s footage and natural studio colour |
| Before-and-after and visible outputs | Authentic examples and honest caveats |
Derived from the supplied 73-second Harper Carroll reference. Its editing mechanisms are adapted to Will’s identity. Font names, exact colours, grade and audio settings cannot be recovered reliably from a viewing analysis.
Scene-by-scene visual analysis completed 15 October 2026. Creator assets are linked, not included in the style pack.
00:00–00:04 before proof · 00:09–00:24 numbered steps and prompt · 00:40–00:47 dashboard · 01:01 testing proof
Supplied reference · Reviewed 15 October 2026